Quick notes

You can take great photos on bad cameras

The best camera is the one you have with you.

— Chase Jarvis

I did not like this quote when I was a child, but I did always have my Canon 550D with me.

An MPB listing for a used Canon EOS 550D body at £90
<£100 second-hand in 2026

In 2012, I got what would become one of my longest-enduring birthday presents, a Canon 550D. From 14-year-old Tom photographing his brother mountain biking to 19-year-old me doing my first paid photography work, this entry-level crop-sensor camera taught me most of what I know about photography. And still today, it’s a great little camera.

With a kit lens, a cheap telephoto, and an adapter for a Pentax 50mm manual focus, I learnt what did and didn’t work. I had no fancy low-light performance, quick autofocus, or rapid burst.1This was a big one for me. I really wanted to be a sports photographer and spent a lot of time photographing my brother mountain biking. The lack of burst meant really honing in on when a shot needed taking. Instead, I missed many photos, and I had to learn things like the latency between hitting the shutter button and the shutter actually closing.

Despite its age, if I put some fast glass on it, the 550D can still take a great photo. If you want to get into photography, you could do worse than a nifty 50 and a Canon 550D.

Crowds at the Olympic Park in London
London 2012 Olympic Park

Even older: these were taken on a Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18.

All quick notes · Longer pieces → Writing